The challenge for the Army logistics community
is to support the speedy deployment of soldiers and equipment
and to sustain them through mission accomplishment. A combat
task force generates thousands of supply requests a day. To
manage that workload and quickly and efficiently process requests
from the battlefield in support of the warfighter, the logistician
clearly needs a robust communications network.
Current tactical communications systems, from the Single Channel
Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS) to Mobile Subscriber
Equipment (MSE) and the Tri-Services Tactical Communications
(TRI–TAC) system, served well to support yesterday’s
command, control, and support services, which relied heavily
on voice and short text messaging at security levels of secret
collateral and below. But today’s commander needs a network
that permits mounted and dismounted, on-the-move communications;
disseminates information at all levels of security; extends
reach and reach-back capabilities; and provides increased throughput
to support warfighter operations.
Because the Army tactical communications network of the 1990s
does not support current needs, Army signalers and logisticians
have been designing connectivity and bandwidth capabilities
that will allow warfighters to get the supplies they need when
they need them. The Army is rapidly infusing state-of-the-art,
commercial off-the-shelf information technology into brigade
combat team (BCT), unit of employment x (UEx, a division equivalent),
and unit of employment y (UEy, a theater and corps equivalent)
warfighting platforms, strategic reach-back sites, and signal
formations. This information technology effort includes hardware,
software, training, and elements of network management, information
assurance, and information dissemination management.
|
|
| The battlefield
of the future, featuring the Army’s units of
employment and brigade combat teams functioning as
part of joint task forces, will depend on the infusion
of state-of-the-art, commercial off-the-shelf information
technology to provide logistics support to the warfighter. |
|
The Army’s Bridge to Future Networks (BFN)
concepts are providing warfighters with the commercial off-the-shelf
communications backbone that enables voice, data, and video
information exchanges throughout the tactical UEy
and into the sustaining base. The BFN is replacing the Area
Common User System Modernization Plan and takes advantage of
existing and directed capabilities. The BFN primarily enhances
battle command technological capabilities.
Communications capabilities for specific combat service support
(CSS) and intelligence programs continue to be developed and
recapitalized to meet
program-specific requirements. Examples include the AN/TSQ–190
Trojan SPIRIT (Special Purpose Integrated Remote Intelligence
Terminal), the AN/MLQ–40 Prophet system, and CSS business
communications initiatives like “Connect the Logistician.” [Trojan
SPIRIT is a satellite terminal that provides access to intelligence
systems. Prophet is the principal signals intelligence and
electronic warfare system for the division and armored cavalry
regiment.]
|
|
| Prophet
(left) and Trojan SPIRIT (right) are tactical intelligence
systems. |
|
Major Change for the Signal Corps
The Army’s new division construct—the BCT and the
UEx headquarters—is transforming the Army and the signal
services. In practice, all division-level signal battalions
in the Army are going away. To keep the network whole, the
UEx will have a G–6 who also will be the “commander
of the network” and will be responsible for integrating
the BCTs into the overall UEx network, managing the network,
and defending the network at the UEx level.
Signal services will reside inside the BCTs as well as inside
the UEx. This arrangement will ensure that each BCT can provide
its own signal support with minimal dependence on higher echelons.
This decentralization promises to be a major change for the
Signal Corps.
Each light BCT will consist of a brigade troop battalion that
includes a signal company, an engineer company, and a military
intelligence company. This BCT also will have two infantry
battalions similar to the ones deployed in Iraq. This approach
allows staff functions previously performed at the division
level to be pushed down to the infantry BCT level. A UEx will
replace division main headquarters.
Signal support organizations will drastically reduce the need
for remote signal sites on hilltops, thereby minimizing the
requirement for force protection of those remote sites, and
reduce the wheeled-vehicle footprint of existing signal support
units at the UEy (theater and corps), UEx (division), and BCT
levels.
Tactical Warfighter Information
“ The Army has accelerated the implementation schedule of the Warfighter
Information
Network Tactical (WIN–T),” said Lieutenant General Steven Boutelle,
the Army’s
Chief Information Officer/G–6, “and is providing interim networking
capability, bandwidth, and connectivity through the Joint Network Transport Capability-Spiral
(JNTC–S).” The JNTC–S fills a gap in bandwidth capability for
command and control, CSS, and intelligence beyond-line-of-sight communications
support down to the battalion level. [WIN–T will replace MSE and TRI–TAC
as the foundation system for routing tactical information.]
Currently, the JNTC–S is being fielded to the 3d Infantry Division (Mechanized)
as it converts to lighter BCTs. JNTC–S will serve both the BCTs and the
UEx and will replace MSE as the networking element of the battlefield infostructure.
The concept behind JNTC–S is that satellites play a key role in providing
communications links. The 3d Infantry Division’s JNTC–S capability
provides a mixed satellite and line-of-sight architecture from the UEx level
down to the battalion level. Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) will enable
a commanding general to talk to individual battalion commanders. The VoIP telephones
are slated to replace existing digital and most circuit-based telephone systems,
providing greater bandwidth efficiency across the network.
The extended networking capability provided by the JNTC–S will affect the
way in which the UEx allocates forces. In the past, a division would dispatch
a BCT to carry out a mission 100 miles away. Now, with new satellite assets,
a battalion may be sufficient to perform the same mission. Units not fielded
with this capability will use gateway switches to interface with units possessing
the new technology.
Custom Network for Supply and Maintenance
Warfighters around the globe are starting to benefit from the capabilities of
new network systems. The CSS Very Small Aperture Terminal (CSS VSAT) system provides
Non-Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) access for logistics transactions
to CSS users almost anywhere on the planet using a global network that connects
remote users to one of several hub stations located around the world via satellite.
Soldiers often use the CSS Automated Information Systems Interface (CAISI) as
a wireless local area network to connect to the satellite. With the satellite
connection, a soldier can check instantly on the status of supplies and replacement
parts.
CSS VSAT, which was first used by several divisions in the 2003 Iraq campaign,
makes a huge difference. This system enables individuals with minimal training
in satellite communications to acquire NIPRNET access. Setup time for the user
generally is less than 30 minutes, depending on the field environment. By using
a wireless interface, such as CAISI, CSS VSAT can be connected either to a local
area network via a hub, router, or switch or to a wide area network. CAISI, which
allows the operator at the terminal to be positioned up to 4 miles away from
the antenna, also allows supply troops to start checking immediately on the status
of desperately needed supplies and to enter requests that combat units radio
in while the logisticians themselves are on the move.
Bypassing “Sneaker Net” and Saving Lives
CAISI allowed much more flexibility in the positioning of units, both in tactical
and garrison facilities, during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Extended NIPRNET connections
allowed support personnel to exchange data over the network rather than travel
and risk exposure to hostilities. Troops also were able to avoid exposure by
reducing the number of trips needed to move data by “sneaker net” from
one location to another. In Iraq, this reduction in travel and exposure to hostilities
has become a lifesaver.
CAISI provides 11 megabytes of wireless line-of-sight transmission, encryption
on all wireless local area network links, and a 2-megabyte Digital Subscriber
Line backup capability for non-line-of-sight
requirements within a 4-mile distance. It extends the tactical connectivity capability
from the theater level to the brigade support area and provides a communications
capability that traditionally has been lacking in such areas as supply chain
management, maintenance, and CSS business systems.
New equipment training will serve as the basis for developing institutional training,
for unit sustainment training, and for rapid train-up of replacement personnel
in support of contingency operations. All training will exploit the right mix
of hands-on training and classroom training needed to maximize the effectiveness
of individual and collective training. The bridging strategy toward full WIN–T
capabilities will reduce personnel, training, and equipment requirements resulting
from the anticipated consolidation of capabilities into common facilities. ALOG
Lieutenant Colonel Tony C. Munson is assigned to the Office of the Chief
Information
Officer/G–6, Department of the Army. He has a B.S. degree in industrial
technology from Jackson State University in Mississippi and an M.A. degree in
national security affairs from the College of Naval Command and Staff. He is
a graduate of Officer Candidate School, the Signal Officer Basic and Advanced
Courses, and the Army Command and General Staff College.
Lieutenant Colonel Forrest Burke is assigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief
of Staff, G–4, Department of the Army. He was the
Logistics Automation Chief in Kuwait with the Coalition Forces Land Component
Command during Operation
Iraqi Freedom. He has a B.S. degree in industrial Operations from Auburn University
in Alabama and M.S. degrees from Florida Institute of Technology and the Air
War College. He is a graduate of the Armor Officer Basic Course, the Ordnance
Officer Advanced Course, and the Air Command and Staff College.