Centralizing all
of the Army’s
Corps/Theater Automated Data
Processing Service Center operations at one site represents
the first step
toward consolidating tactical supply systems for the modular
Army.
The Army’s transition to a brigade-centric
structure requires a number of changes to its logistics support
concepts, organizations, and processes. One of the most significant
changes removed the administration, operations, and support
of the Corps/Theater Automated Data Processing Service Center
(CTASC) from corps and theater materiel management centers
and placed them at the theater support commands or Army support
commands (ASCs). Each CTASC provides end-user support of the
Standard Army Retail Supply System (SARSS), which is the Army’s
tactical supply system.
In order to meet its schedule for transforming into a modular
force, the Army needed a centralized CTASC administration and
operations center. Such a centralized center was needed to
meet the requirements of a brigade-based force, support the
Army’s 500-Day Plan for information technology, and simplify
the migration toward a centralized environment for the Single
Army Logistics Enterprise (SALE). [The Army Chief Information
Office/G–6 issued the Army 500-Day Plan in October 2005
to provide a roadmap for achieving a joint, network-centric
information enterprise in support of the warfighter.]
Those of us working on the project realized that centralizing
CTASC operations at a single site would provide significant
enhancements by reducing the logistics footprint, standardizing
network and processing operations, reducing total network traffic,
simplifying unit transfers for deployments, and greatly simplifying
post-deployment software support. Most important, however,
centralizing CTASC operations would substantially reduce the
number of personnel needed for CTASC administration and operations.
Developing a Plan
To accomplish this monumental task, Lieutenant General Ann E. Dunwoody, the Deputy
Chief of Staff, G–4, Department of the Army, directed her staff to work
with the Army Combined Arms Support Command (CASCOM), the Army Materiel Command
(AMC), the Program Executive Office for Enterprise Information Systems (PEO EIS),
and the G–4s of major subordinate commands to plan for and execute the
centralization of all Army CTASCs at a single site.
In January 2006, CASCOM hosted an integrated concept team (ICT), which mapped
the way ahead for CTASC operations under modularity. The ICT was composed of
CTASC and SARSS subject-matter experts from the major commands, CASCOM, and the
Department of the Army G–4. Over a 6-week period, the team developed a
plan. On 28 March 2006, based on the plan’s recommendations, Lieutenant
General Dunwoody signed a memorandum directing the transfer of all Army CTASCs
to a single, collocated site, with a separate geographic location for a contingency
of operations (COOP) site.
The AMC Logistics Support Activity (LOGSA) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, was
selected as the central CTASC production site and the Functional Processing Center
at the Software Development
Center at Fort Lee, Virginia, ultimately was selected as the site that would
perform COOP operations. The AMC and LOGSA commanders announced that they were
prepared to accept the CTASC mission from losing commands in accordance with
a timeline that had been synchronized to the Army’s transformation schedule
by the ICT members.
|
|
| The central
CTASC production site is located at the AMC Logistics
Support Activity at Redstone
Arsenal, Alabama. CTASC operations and administration
(above) are conducted just outside the CTASC/Middleware
computer room (below.) Middleware, which comprises
both hardware and
software, revises data in the Standard Army Retail
Supply System (SARSS), thereby extending the
use of the Army's current logistics and financial
systems until they are replaced by the Single Army
Logistics Enterprise (SALE). |
|
 |
CASCOM immediately went to work and developed
the table of distribution and allowances out-of-cycle adjustments
needed to conduct CTASC operations at LOGSA and the COOP site
and forwarded them to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff,
G–3, Department of the Army, Force Management Directorate,
where they were approved and implemented. Chief Warrant Officer
(W–5) Wade Lovorn, who was running CTASC operations for
III Corps, was selected as the first Officer in Charge and
Chief of Operations of the new production CTASC at LOGSA.
Centralizing CTASC Operations
The Army is well on its way toward achieving a centralized
CTASC. On 7 April 2006, the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC)
moved its CTASC operation from Fort Gillem, Georgia, to the
LOGSA facility, marking the beginning of centralized CTASC
operations. In April, the 2d Corps Materiel Management Center
at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, moved its CTASC operations to
LOGSA. It was followed by the 321st Theater Materiel Management
Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana; the Installation Management
Agency at Fort Monroe, Virginia; the 4th Corps Materiel Management
Center at Fort Hood, Texas; U.S. Army Europe in Germany; Eighth
U.S. Army in Korea; and U.S. Army Pacific in Hawaii. The move
of the National Guard CTASC from Little Rock, Arkansas, to
LOGSA in January 2007 signaled the end of the collocation effort.
The focus for the remainder of fiscal year 2007 is on CTASC server consolidation.
Much like the ICT that met to develop the plan for CTASC collocation, a new team
will stand up to develop the plan for CTASC server consolidation. Preliminary
studies indicate that a reduction from the current 10 servers to 3 or 4 is possible
and will result in more streamlined operations and a further reduction in the
support requirement with no degradation in service and support to the tactical
logistics community.
Work standing up the COOP site at the Software Development Center at Fort Lee
continues. It was expected to be fully operational not later than February 2007,
with the first COOP exercise planned
for March.
ALOG
Thomas H. Ament, Jr., is a career logistics management specialist serving
since
March 2003 on the staff of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G–4, Department of
the Army. He previously was assigned to the U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) G–4
staff, where he was responsible for developing the USAREUR Information Warehouse.
He currently is enrolled in acquisition management courses with the Defense Acquisition
University.